CFTC says Americans can trade stock perps, then gets sued
The CFTC said US exchanges can list perpetual futures on individual stocks, and a new industry group sued in New York the same day, according to Decrypt.

The facts
- According to Decrypt, CFTC Chairman Michael Selig said equity perpetual futures can now trade on CFTC-registered exchanges, as security futures products under joint CFTC and SEC oversight.
- Seven entities hold both the CFTC and SEC registrations needed: Cboe, CME, Coinbase, Kalshi, Bitnomial, Nadex and ICE Futures U.S. Kalshi has a filing covering 56 to 58 names, and Coinbase has filed for Apple, Tesla and Nvidia perps.
- A group called the Capital Markets Alliance sued in the Southern District of New York. Its members include Cboe, Citadel Securities and the Healthy Markets Association, and it wants the policy eliminated.
- A CFTC spokesman called the suit "troubling". Decrypt says CME tried a similar challenge over crypto perps, and it went nowhere.
Case notes · Danny's take
Why it matters
Perps have lived offshore for years because US law had no clear home for them. This statement gives them one, but only on a short list of regulated venues. Look at who is suing: members of the same market structure, not outsiders. That's a fight over who gets to run leveraged products, not just whether they should exist. One approval, one lawsuit, same day. Rules that arrive quickly can be challenged quickly.
For traders
Don't trade the headline. Watch whether Kalshi's launch actually happens within days, and how the court case moves. If you use leverage on news candles around this, size down, because the legal risk is live.
For builders
Only exchanges with both CFTC and SEC registrations can list these today, so the gap for others is compliance infrastructure. Decrypt says Hyperliquid and Lighter are next in line for potential approvals, so watch that route.
Not financial advice. Do your own investigation.
This story was summarised with AI from Decrypt's reporting and checked against our editorial policy. Danny's take reflects his views. Disclaimer.
